what if (nobody) wrote:
"
It is the personal story that is so seductive......and the glue that binds the dream of separation"
what if (somebody) read:
"
It is the personal story that is so seductive......and the glue that binds the dream of separation"
empty-and-full wrote:
What if this glue is really a corrosively beautiful appearance that melts everything away.

sound like two views about glue...
sticky situation, which one to agree with?
what if glue is what is used after some
thing is broken?
what to use when some
one is broken,
or has just come unglued?
"delaminating" is what jim harris calls it...
why would we want to relaminate?
maybe this self / illusory self is both processes,
laminating & unlaminating,
peeling off layers, and adding new ones...
the ultimate unpeeling (inferred)
would be to arrive at the last layer,
unpeel it, and disolve ino the unlayer,
the layerless layer, the super-peeled...
if that one,
that layerless layered one,
blending and disolving in the infinite
nothingness of unpeeled nirvana...
if that one cares or desires to interact
with any other one who is still layered,
wouldn't that unlayered one need to layer on
at least one (very thin) layer?
how can nobodyness interact with somebodyness,
nothingness with somethingness,
unpeeled with peeled?
language is a layer of interaction...
any layer, one layer on nothingness is
enough to make it something,
to separate it from it's hidden source,
everyone in here, who writes a single word,
has taken on a layer,
only for a moment perhaps,
but there is no other way it can be...
or is there?
