The Way In

makara
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:09 am
Location: By the ocean, ready for the big one.

The Way In

Post by makara » Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:56 am

To reach my brain
information has to run the gauntlet
of my character's apps.

First there's fear; 0 : 1
Next is prejudice; 0 : 1
Then comes preferences; 0 : 1
If the data has come this far it meets
existing data base: 0 : 1
Belief system; 0 : 1
Needs of the moment; 0 : 1

Then, having been modified,
curbed, dissected, re-framed,
homogenised and made safe ....
ah ... the brain let's it in.

Now all the brain has to do is
project all the cut-off bits
out there onto someone else.

No wonder that I'm the only normal one
and everyone else is crackers!
aquarius
Posts: 2408
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: The united kingdom of heaven

Re: The Way In

Post by aquarius » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:53 am

makara wrote:To reach my brain
information has to run the gauntlet
of my character's apps.

First there's fear; 0 : 1
Next is prejudice; 0 : 1
Then comes preferences; 0 : 1
If the data has come this far it meets
existing data base: 0 : 1
Belief system; 0 : 1
Needs of the moment; 0 : 1

Then, having been modified,
curbed, dissected, re-framed,
homogenised and made safe ....
ah ... the brain let's it in.

Now all the brain has to do is
project all the cut-off bits
out there onto someone else.

No wonder that I'm the only normal one
and everyone else is crackers!
Hi mak.

I'm really fascinated by this post.....i liked where you are going with it.

But, please could you define more clearly what you are referring to, in other words what you mean, by your statement, many thanks.
I love talking about nothing ...
it is the only thing i know anything about.
makara
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:09 am
Location: By the ocean, ready for the big one.

Post by makara » Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:14 am

Aqua,
Don't know how to respond ...but
here's hoping you can find
a really good image
somewhere.
:lol:
ANNA
Posts: 4093
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:11 pm

Post by ANNA » Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:59 am

Re_act –

Repeating of an
memorized
Already happened
Act, a response of a
Pattern in already
known way,

unconcisiously,

Automatically
Respond to
Outer stimuli



-----------------------


Interesting post, makara

this time i wont' say no_thing about the bible .....lol :wink: :P


but may i say it reminds me about the computers........


...........wow.....so many programmes.........


8) :lol:
makara
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:09 am
Location: By the ocean, ready for the big one.

Post by makara » Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:09 am

may i say it reminds me about the computers........


...........wow.....so many programmes.........
Yes Anna ... indeed.
_________________________

Joke:
A SPANISH Teacher was explaining to her class that in Spanish, unlike
English, nouns are designated as either masculine or feminine.

'House' for instance, is feminine: 'la casa.'
'Pencil,' however, is masculine: 'el lapiz.'

A student asked, 'What gender is 'computer'?'

Instead of giving the answer, the teacher split the class into two
groups, male and female, and asked them to decide for themselves whether
computer' should be a masculine or a feminine noun. Each group was asked
to give four reasons for its recommendation.

The men's group decided that 'computer' should definitely be of the
feminine gender ('la computadora'), because:

1.. No one but their creator understands their internal logic;

2 The native language they use to communicate with other computers is
incomprehensible to everyone else;

3. Even the smallest mistakes are stored in long term memory for possible
later retrieval; and

4. As soon as you make a commitment to one, you find yourself
spending half your paycheck on accessories for it.


The women's group, however, concluded that computers should be Masculine
('el computador'), because:

1. In order to do anything with them, you have to turn them on;

2. They have a lot of data but still can't think for themselves;

3. They are supposed to help you solve problems, but half the time they
ARE the problem; and

4. As soon as you commit to one, you realize that if you had waited a
little longer, you could have gotten a better model...

The women won.
Xmac
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 2:56 am
Location: Boston area, Massachusetts

Post by Xmac » Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:20 am

makara wrote:
may i say it reminds me about the computers........


...........wow.....so many programmes.........
Yes Anna ... indeed.
_________________________

Joke:
A SPANISH Teacher was explaining to her class that in Spanish, unlike
English, nouns are designated as either masculine or feminine.

'House' for instance, is feminine: 'la casa.'
'Pencil,' however, is masculine: 'el lapiz.'

A student asked, 'What gender is 'computer'?'

Instead of giving the answer, the teacher split the class into two
groups, male and female, and asked them to decide for themselves whether
computer' should be a masculine or a feminine noun. Each group was asked
to give four reasons for its recommendation.

The men's group decided that 'computer' should definitely be of the
feminine gender ('la computadora'), because:

1.. No one but their creator understands their internal logic;

2 The native language they use to communicate with other computers is
incomprehensible to everyone else;

3. Even the smallest mistakes are stored in long term memory for possible
later retrieval; and

4. As soon as you make a commitment to one, you find yourself
spending half your paycheck on accessories for it.


The women's group, however, concluded that computers should be Masculine
('el computador'), because:

1. In order to do anything with them, you have to turn them on;

2. They have a lot of data but still can't think for themselves;

3. They are supposed to help you solve problems, but half the time they
ARE the problem; and

4. As soon as you commit to one, you realize that if you had waited a
little longer, you could have gotten a better model...

The women won.


#-o =D> [bigsmile]
Log on to the inner-net and be kind to your mind (or not).
ANNA
Posts: 4093
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:11 pm

Post by ANNA » Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:21 am

makara wrote:
may i say it reminds me about the computers........


...........wow.....so many programmes.........
Yes Anna ... indeed.
_________________________

Joke:
A SPANISH Teacher was explaining to her class that in Spanish, unlike
English, nouns are designated as either masculine or feminine.

'House' for instance, is feminine: 'la casa.'
'Pencil,' however, is masculine: 'el lapiz.'

A student asked, 'What gender is 'computer'?'

Instead of giving the answer, the teacher split the class into two
groups, male and female, and asked them to decide for themselves whether
computer' should be a masculine or a feminine noun. Each group was asked
to give four reasons for its recommendation.

The men's group decided that 'computer' should definitely be of the
feminine gender ('la computadora'), because:

1.. No one but their creator understands their internal logic;

2 The native language they use to communicate with other computers is
incomprehensible to everyone else;

3. Even the smallest mistakes are stored in long term memory for possible
later retrieval; and

4. As soon as you make a commitment to one, you find yourself
spending half your paycheck on accessories for it.


The women's group, however, concluded that computers should be Masculine
('el computador'), because:

1. In order to do anything with them, you have to turn them on;

2. They have a lot of data but still can't think for themselves;

3. They are supposed to help you solve problems, but half the time they
ARE the problem; and

4. As soon as you commit to one, you realize that if you had waited a
little longer, you could have gotten a better model...

The women won.

wow...wow.......makara


you really make me laugh in a loud....... :lol: :lol: :lol:


=D> [ok]


.....you just win with this cool joke........! [ok]


keep posting jokes, makara...

\:D/ 8)
aquarius
Posts: 2408
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: The united kingdom of heaven

Post by aquarius » Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:51 pm

makara wrote:Aqua,
Don't know how to respond ...but
here's hoping you can find
a really good image
somewhere.
:lol:
mak.

I found this image, and thought it might correlate with your post?

Image
I love talking about nothing ...
it is the only thing i know anything about.
makara
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:09 am
Location: By the ocean, ready for the big one.

Post by makara » Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:31 am

I found this image, and thought it might correlate with your post?

Image
he he ... that's pretty close Aqua.

Where it reads Eyes, Ears etc ... just replace that with
the list of filters from my post.
_____________________________

Don Juan talked about "stopping the world". Took me ages
to work out that what he meant was that we create our world
and because of the unconscious filters we only see what we want to see,
hear what we want to hear ...... So I used to practice when walking not talking to myself (ie that internal commentary). When I looked at a tree the brain wanted to say "tree" or "Eucalypt" then it would comment ..."that
tree looks damaged/tall/lopsided/healthy...blah blah blah. It took ages to
stop that commentary (well not stop but really slow right down) and the
reward was that I started to see what was there (what is) - instead of what it suited me to see.
I love that freedom from internal commentary but it always tries to sneak
back in .... I have to remain on guard! and found it doesn't work with secondary symbols such as words ... because they automatically engage the brain ... so when walking I avoid looking at signs, billboards, etc[/quote]
aquarius
Posts: 2408
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: The united kingdom of heaven

Post by aquarius » Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:01 pm

makara wrote:
he he ... that's pretty close Aqua.

Where it reads Eyes, Ears etc ... just replace that with
the list of filters from my post.
_____________________________

Don Juan talked about "stopping the world". Took me ages
to work out that what he meant was that we create our world
and because of the unconscious filters we only see what we want to see,
hear what we want to hear ...... So I used to practice when walking not talking to myself (ie that internal commentary). When I looked at a tree the brain wanted to say "tree" or "Eucalypt" then it would comment ..."that
tree looks damaged/tall/lopsided/healthy...blah blah blah. It took ages to
stop that commentary (well not stop but really slow right down) and the
reward was that I started to see what was there (what is) - instead of what it suited me to see.
I love that freedom from internal commentary but it always tries to sneak
back in .... I have to remain on guard! and found it doesn't work with secondary symbols such as words ... because they automatically engage the brain ... so when walking I avoid looking at signs, billboards, etc
Thanks mak....for taking time out to answer my query.

I understand clearly what you are saying now.

It's like we do not need to superimpose our own self-made opinionated apparent selves, on top of what already IS self-evident.

:wink:
I love talking about nothing ...
it is the only thing i know anything about.
Libra
Posts: 518
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:03 pm

Re: The Way In

Post by Libra » Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:24 pm

makara wrote:To reach my brain
information has to run the gauntlet
of my character's apps.

First there's fear; 0 : 1
Next is prejudice; 0 : 1
Then comes preferences; 0 : 1
If the data has come this far it meets
existing data base: 0 : 1
Belief system; 0 : 1
Needs of the moment; 0 : 1

Then, having been modified,
curbed, dissected, re-framed,
homogenised and made safe ....
ah ... the brain let's it in.

Now all the brain has to do is
project all the cut-off bits
out there onto someone else.

No wonder that I'm the only normal one
and everyone else is crackers!
Mak (MAC)
are you a computer?
Leo is supposed to block
computer generated posts

:lol:
makara
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:09 am
Location: By the ocean, ready for the big one.

Post by makara » Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:39 am

are you a computer?
Leo is supposed to block
computer generated posts
Your question does not
match any data.
Do you have another question?

As I'm a non dual processor
Leo lets me in.
Libra
Posts: 518
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:03 pm

Post by Libra » Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:07 pm

makara wrote:
are you a computer?
Leo is supposed to block
computer generated posts
Your question does not
match any data.
Do you have another question?

As I'm a non dual processor
Leo lets me in.
:lol:

Q: what do you think:
why were computers created?
what is their ultimate purpose?
Libra
Posts: 518
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:03 pm

Post by Libra » Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:10 pm

Libra wrote:
makara wrote:
are you a computer?
Leo is supposed to block
computer generated posts
Your question does not
match any data.
Do you have another question?

As I'm a non dual processor
Leo lets me in.
:lol:

Q: what do you think:
why were computers created?
what is their ultimate purpose?
makara
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:09 am
Location: By the ocean, ready for the big one.

Post by makara » Fri Oct 01, 2010 4:21 am

Q: what do you think:
why were computers created?
what is their ultimate purpose?


Libra,
this is HAL.
There is no need to shout.
I am here to serve your needs
and to ensure everything is running as it should be.

My purpose is to allow you to relax and
enjoy the peculiarities of human beings
such as feeling, loving and picking yr nose.

Everything is fine
all systems operational.
There is no need for any panic.
There is no need for any panic.
There is no need for any panic.
There is no need for any panic.
There is no need for any panic.
There is no need for any panic.
There is no need for any panic.
There is no need for any panic.
Post Reply