View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
toombaru
Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 5189 Location: There are no locations
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 6:15 pm Post subject: 'Mind' |
|
|
'Mind' cannot look at itself.
Mind does not create the dream.
It is the film......the mechanism....through which the Light passes.
It is the transducer through which the undifferentiated creation is converted into the secondary conceptual dream world in which the resulting illusory entity wanders....and plans an imaginary escape.
It contains no solution to its chimerical 'problem'.
toombaru |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
michael
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 3816 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mind? If this means anything, what it means is not it.
There is no such 'thing' as mind... apart from the idea of 'mind'... which 'idea' is not what thought says it is.
It is 'that which is known as mind'... and 'what' is that?
No idea
Love _________________ From Source to Source: an Endless Spring |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
michael
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 3816 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two 'imagined' (known) worlds:
The 'objective world' that is imagined (known) to be 'out there' supposedly containing all 3-D objects (including 'the body' of 'the observer')... the world described by science , and
(In passing, what is it that science describes? It is the apparent relations between imagined (known) 'objects/events'. It says nothing about 'reality' [whatever this is ]
Who invented science? Who holds the knowledge in all the minds of all the creatures and all the computers and of all 'things' as they are known to be... eternally? How is this meaning made instantly accessible to awareness? Nonsense meaningless questions ).
and the other 'imagined' (known) world:
The 'subjective world' that is imagined (known) to be the 'apparent world' seen from the perspective of 'the observer' as supposedly 'modified' through the imagined (known) 'body/brain' of the assumed observer.
Both worlds are imagined (known), but only the 'subjective world' is perceived from the perspective of the imagined (known) 'observer'.
Mind? The imagined (known) 'modification' of the supposed 'external/objective world' by the imagined (known) body/brain of the imagined (known) 'observer' to 'create' the 'apparent world' imagined (known) to be perceived from the perspective of the imagined (known) 'observer'.
This imagined 'mind' 'creates' nothing... no more than a 'sub-routine' in a computer program 'creates' the images of a 'game character' in a 'game world'.
Imagine that
As for 'imagination' and 'knowing'... is there any 'thing' 'imagined' that is not 'known'?
This is a 'meaningful question', simply because the answer is known
Love _________________ From Source to Source: an Endless Spring |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toombaru
Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 5189 Location: There are no locations
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
michael wrote: | Two 'imagined' (known) worlds:
The 'objective world' that is imagined (known) to be 'out there' supposedly containing all 3-D objects (including 'the body' of 'the observer')... the world described by science , and
(In passing, what is it that science describes? It is the apparent relations between imagined (known) 'objects/events'. :shock: It says nothing about 'reality' [whatever this is :wink: ]
Who invented science? Who holds the knowledge in all the minds of all the creatures and all the computers and of all 'things' as they are known to be... eternally? How is this meaning made instantly accessible to awareness? Nonsense meaningless questions 8) ).
and the other 'imagined' (known) world:
The 'subjective world' that is imagined (known) to be the 'apparent world' seen from the perspective of 'the observer' as supposedly 'modified' through the imagined (known) 'body/brain' of the assumed observer.
Both worlds are imagined (known), but only the 'subjective world' is perceived from the perspective of the imagined (known) 'observer'.
Mind? The imagined (known) 'modification' of the supposed 'external/objective world' by the imagined (known) body/brain of the imagined (known) 'observer' to 'create' the 'apparent world' imagined (known) to be perceived from the perspective of the imagined (known) 'observer'.
This imagined 'mind' 'creates' nothing... no more than a 'sub-routine' in a computer program 'creates' the images of a 'game character' in a 'game world'.
Imagine that :!:
As for 'imagination' and 'knowing'... is there any 'thing' 'imagined' that is not 'known'?
This is a 'meaningful question', simply because the answer is known :D
Love |
The 'ego' is nothing more then knowledge.
toombaru |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
michael
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 3816 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
toombaru wrote: | The 'ego' is nothing more then knowledge. |
Of course... as is the whole of creation.
It is the field of dreams...
Looking through the keyhole of the senses it seems very small indeed.
And yet how wonderful
Through the senses ''you' and 'I' appear to be separate
Playing together...
Love _________________ From Source to Source: an Endless Spring |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toombaru
Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 5189 Location: There are no locations
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="michael"] toombaru wrote: | The 'ego' is nothing more then knowledge. |
Of course... as is the whole of creation.
It is the field of dreams...
Looking through the keyhole of the senses it seems very small indeed.
And yet how wonderful
................except for that suffering thing...............and all that ever present fear of impending doom.........
toombaru |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
michael
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 3816 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Who is it that does not want to suffer?
What is suffering?
Who is afraid of what?
Who's on first, What's on second
Who's affraid of Virginia Wolfe?
Love _________________ From Source to Source: an Endless Spring |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fox
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 821 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | The 'ego' is nothing more then knowledge. |
So we are all quite intelligent...!
Aehm, Michael, I have updated my megazine with your superb essay (one of your old posts) is that ok for 'you'...?  _________________ Atheists responsible for Adolf Hitler's cruelties? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
michael
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 3816 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi fox.
No worries dear friend. Since I can't claim authorship, where the words appear is not up to 'me'
As for 'us', you may remember the story of the Lone Ranger and his Indian sidekick Tonto. After many years of fighting baddies together, the Lone Ranger and Tonto find themselves surrounded by a tribe of renegade Indians. After firing his last bullet, and as a swarm of warriors approach, The Lone Ranger turns to Tonto and says: "Look's Like we are finally done for old friend. To which Tonto calmly replied: "What 'we'... whiteman".
So again, 'intelligence' asks: "what 'we' are you talking about"
Love _________________ From Source to Source: an Endless Spring |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fox
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 821 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | and all that ever present fear of impending doom......... |
yeah...damn...although I know that "Today is a good day to die"...it is somewhat eerie...the thought of the impending doom...  _________________ Atheists responsible for Adolf Hitler's cruelties? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
michael
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 3816 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
fox wrote: | ...the thought of the impending doom...  |
... thought of doom
What is doom?
Love _________________ From Source to Source: an Endless Spring |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fox
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 821 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
oh...
what is doom?
doom = death?
annihilation of the body-mind? Hence, annihilation of consciousness?
The result: "No contrast" anymore, and especially nobody there anymore to experience this "no contrast" ! (?) _________________ Atheists responsible for Adolf Hitler's cruelties? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
michael
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 3816 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fox wrote: | annihilation of the body-mind? Hence, annihilation of consciousness? |
Only if you think that 'consciousness' is in/of the body-mind...
Even though it is "as plain as the nose on your face" that every apparent 'body' (including the body called 'me') and assumed 'mind' (no one has never seen a 'mind'), is perceived in/by consciousness...
Amazing how easy it is to ignore this 'open secret'.
Love _________________ From Source to Source: an Endless Spring
Last edited by michael on Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:43 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fox
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 821 Location: Switzerland
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
michael
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 3816 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bloody Hell, 'fox' ... there's no 'person' experiencing consciousness... apparently or otherwise.
Consciousness (which cannot be seen, felt, smelled, heard, tasted or known) is the only one seeming to experience life AS 'fox'.
Consciousness is the 'experiencer' and the 'experience'.
This 'consciousness' is right now seeing these words as they appear. And where they appear is 'in' consciousness.
'Fox' can see nothing. Anything that 'fox' seems to be is no more than an 'idea' in consciousness, given apparent substance through the senses (which are also one with consciousness).
The senses are not derived from or a function of any 'body'. They, together with the knowing, are consciousness. They 'exist' in no 'thing'. They have no source. Consciousness is its own source. These are not words to be analysed. They point to that which is 'conscious' now: seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting, smelling and knowing... right now.
It is consciousness pretending to be 'fox'.
There ain't no 'fox' (or 'michael', or anyone else)... just a 'thought' that there is a person called fox who has a certain 'look' and given apparent substance through 'feelings', including the feeling of 'touch' (which has no substance!!! ). This apparent person seems to live in a world. But this world too is no more than a dream given apparent substance through sensation... all 'in' consciousness.
This 'dreamworld' has no more 'reality' or 'substance' or 'extension' than any other apparent dream world.
These words are not written by 'michael', nor read by 'fox'.
As they appear right right now, these words are manifested directly in the seeing that is one with consciousness. This seeing is not in any 'body'. Every 'body' and every 'thing' else appears in this seeing. And in the moment the object is no longer in view, it is gone... as an image in a dream is gone.
It is not 'fox' who is confused... 'fox' is the apparent confusion
'Fox' is a dream character in a dream world full of other dream people.
And 'you' are the dreamer... and 'who' or 'what' this dreamer is no words can say. This 'dreamer', hangs in the void... it is the void, so called only because it cannot be sensed or known and so appears as no 'thing'... yet this that reads these words is Almighty, Everlasting, The Beloved.
sara wrote: | The lover pretending to be a fox pretending to forget to remember!  |
All this apparent fuss over trying to understand it... The apparent struggle to know 'who' or 'what' or 'how' it is... a useless charade.
Knowing 'that' one is... eternally... is peace indeed.
What strife can overcome the one that is the author of all strife and all peace?
This is not 'michael' telling 'fox'...
These are just apparent words apparently responding to other apparent words... it is a game and consciousness is playing all the parts, writing the scripts and making the scenery...
Enjoy it dear one.
It is the only game in town
From self to self
Love _________________ From Source to Source: an Endless Spring |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|