6 posts • Page 1 of 1
dilaram wrote:The One's life.Kailashana wrote:I'd say that's a good idea, as far as some ideas come and go.
Whose life is it anyway?
Wow……….i came here
with the i-dea of an answer
and then saw Dilaram's answer ‘One’s Life’
which is the same....
…..then recalled that ‘Satellite’ or Rob
(i am not sure if he is now at the Forum ,
but for sure he was for many years! )
wrote something lately about Source at his blog
here it goes:
SATURDAY, 2 OCTOBER 2010
Flowering Of Source
EVERYTHING is activity, expression, flowering... of Source.
We could say that Source is primary and how it manifests, what it portrays... is its display. Take this miraculous apparition; that there are organisms with minds/consciousness (apparent or not) is pure activity of Source. Whatever is going on, however it appears... necessitates Source.
You can negate everything - even key concepts like mind, consciousness, the witness, ultimate subject etc... yet you can not negate Source: the undying, unborn 'wellspring' that has to 'be'.
This Source is what the ancients are pointing to.
Sit with the implications here... look!!! For anything to be at all, be it real, unreal, apparent, conceptual, abstract, permanent, shifting... even for concepts like unconscious and nothingness to have an ontology or meaning... necessitates Source - it's innescapable.
Once we acknowledge an essential inextinguishable Source, our understandings and meanings lose their absoluteness... it's all wide open.